Thursday 4 October 2018

The Flat Rate Conundrum


When DrivenByQ Ltd incorporated (in 2007), it seemed a good idea to register for VAT (Value Added Tax). Although our turnover did not exceed the registration threshold at the time (of £86k per annum), we registered anyway and used the simplified VAT system known as the Flat Rate Scheme. We charged VAT to account customers but could not reclaim VAT on purchases.

The upshot of not reclaiming VAT was retaining a good portion of the VAT collected on the invoices. Over time it was quite a nice revenue which the business would not otherwise have accessed. It generated around 8.5% extra revenue on the turnover. The scheme worked great until April 2017 when the rules were updated.

The UK Government made a change to tackle ‘aggressive abuse’ known as the limited cost trader scheme. This required a business to spend more than 2% of its turnover on goods to qualify for the same rate of VAT retention. For DrivenByQ the only way this was possible was to move our vehicles inside the business and claim the fuel as goods (something only a private hire company can do).

The issue here was that the vehicles were previously owned by ourselves as sub-contractors. Therefore moving the vehicles in to the business would also require us to be employees. After some detraction, we finally decided to move the cars and ourselves as owners inside the business. This required a payroll and a pension scheme to be setup along with salaries.

Just as it began to work smoothly, a competitor went in to liquidation and we acquired a new customer spending over £50k on account. This pushed the turnover above the flat rate threshold (£193k) and meant the scheme could no longer be utilised. On one hand it was frustrating but on the other, it generated enough revenue to place a deposit on a brand new Mercedes. We managed to claim the VAT back too.